Why did Sri Lanka played without their best bowlers against Australia? Krishantha November 13, 2010. Posted in Sports 1071 8 Comments On 18th, I mean. When is Sri Lanka’s next scheduled match and with who? Thanks. Blog this! Bookmark on Delicious Digg this post Recommend on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share with Stumblers Tweet about it Subscribe to the comments on this post Print for later Bookmark in Browser Tell a friend Tags: australia bowlers match Sri Lanka Trackback from your site. Related Posts Hire a Bus for Your Next Trip Jan 5, 2018 National Guidelines for the Management of Child Abuse and Neglect in Sri Lanka Aug 25, 2017 Solar Power Companies in Sri Lanka Jul 19, 2017 8 thoughts on “Why did Sri Lanka played without their best bowlers against Australia?” firstname.lastname@example.org ask me says: November 13, 2010 at 5:00 am SRI LANKA SAVED THEIR BOWLERS FOR THE FINALS. THEY R GONNA USE EM IN THE FINAL. SRI LANKA’S NEXT MATCH IS AGAINST NEW ZEALAND Reply seagull says: November 13, 2010 at 5:00 am Because Sri Lanka didn’t want to show their trump cards before the final. Australia will find themselves unprepared in the final against Murali and Vaas. Next match against NZ. Reply nalakafairly says: November 13, 2010 at 5:00 am QUITE EASILY TACTICAL REASONS I MEAN THEY RESTD THEM TO AMBUSH AUSTRALIA IN FINALS & SURPRISE THEM. tHEN AUSTRALIA HAVE NO ANSWERS TO THESE # GREAT BOWLERS. Reply channa says: November 13, 2010 at 5:00 am the aussies are in for a surprise in the final. i like this strategic move by the sri lankans. next match is against nz. Reply Sobhan Mohanty says: November 13, 2010 at 5:00 am Well they wanted to rest their premiun bowlers before the crucial matches and further had Sri lanka won that match then there were chances that it would have faced Australia as their semi-final opponent. Reply jobees says: November 13, 2010 at 5:00 am One of the bowlers had an injury and so he had to be rested. Marlirine they just decided to rest him. Maybe it was tacted so the aussie batman wouldn’t be able to anlyles their mistakes against him. And improve them in time for the final. Or may be they knew they where safe to make the quarter finals. Reply TrailBlazer says: November 13, 2010 at 5:00 am Malinga (with the funny hair) had injured his leg while playing football. People ask why he played soccer when he’s supposed 2 play cricket!! Vaas and Murali were kept for tactical reasons… so they could do a whole lot of damage to the Aussies…when they meet in the finals. SL is meeting NZ and hopefully they’ll win & get in2 the finals. Reply vakayil k says: November 13, 2010 at 5:00 am Since Sri Lanka have already qualified for semi finals, the match against Australia on 18th April was insignificant to them. Hence they may have decided to rest their key bowlers on the following considerations: 1) They did not want tom expose their kley bowlers to Australian batsmen. 2) They did not want to risk any injury to their key bowlers. Reply Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment Name * Email * Website Human Verification: In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.